# 2027.0.1 Metadata Node

**URL:** <https://forum.logik.tv/t/2027-0-1-metadata-node/14598>\
**Category:** Flame Questions\
**Tags:** metadata\
**Created:** [June 23, 2026, 12:08pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/2027-0-1-metadata-node/14598 "2026-06-23T12:08:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AdamArcher](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/adamarcher/32/3529_2.png) [@AdamArcher](https://forum.logik.tv/u/AdamArcher)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2026, 12:08pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/2027-0-1-metadata-node/14598/1 "2026-06-23T12:08:12Z")

</div>

Thank you @Slabrie, @fredwarren and team for the Metadata node. Not being able to pass through metadata has been a massive pain in the ass on a few projects, to the point that we didn’t use Flame/Flare on them. Great tool and like the level of control you have. I’m sure a large swathe of Flame users won’t use it but for our use case it makes a HUGE difference

Here lies proof that you can make some of the users happy some of the time

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slabrie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7cd45c/32.png) [@Slabrie](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Slabrie)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2026, 12:46pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/2027-0-1-metadata-node/14598/2 "2026-06-23T12:46:09Z")

</div>

Thanks for the kind words @AdamArcher! Looking forward your real-life production feedback using Flame 2027!
