# Flame 2026 - recover from Lost media-Cache

**URL:** <https://forum.logik.tv/t/flame-2026-recover-from-lost-media-cache/13300>\
**Category:** Flame Questions\
**Tags:** backup\
**Created:** [July 30, 2025, 4:14pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/flame-2026-recover-from-lost-media-cache/13300 "2025-07-30T16:14:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![allklier](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/allklier/32/4309_2.png) [@allklier](https://forum.logik.tv/u/allklier)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2025, 8:57pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/flame-2026-recover-from-lost-media-cache/13300/3 "2025-07-30T20:57:23Z")

</div>

Note that the [‘implemented in 2026’](https://forum.logik.tv/t/flame-feedback-requests-implemented-in-flame-2026/12730) list did not claim to separate these storage classes, only that the path is selecteable.

This[‘unmanaged media workflow’](https://feedback.autodesk.com/project/feedback/view.html?cap=5afe6c84-5cb3-447a-b36c-cbd7f0688f84&uf=a7ffe0a8-6069-4bbf-ad22-57ebc5194a23&slsid=8fe4b28c-7a47-4fa3-a4d9-fb8163c6661d) enhancement from @cnoellert is marked as implemented, but it may be a question of how you interpret it.

Was the intent to have renders in user space, or was the intent to separate volatile from needed?

Also note this still open enhancement request to [‘rebuild MIO’](https://feedback.autodesk.com/project/feedback/view.html?cap=5afe6c84-5cb3-447a-b36c-cbd7f0688f84&uf=1f1ad207-e07d-4cc4-ad8d-2e45a82ff2b0&slsid=6b0d418a-0e5a-4b27-9110-73b83cae4672)files if lost.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.logik.tv/t/flame-2026-recover-from-lost-media-cache/13300)._