# Please recommend a blur-node based on depth

**URL:** <https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401>\
**Category:** Flame Questions\
**Tags:** batch\
**Created:** [August 19, 2025, 1:41am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401 "2025-08-19T01:41:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seostar](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/seostar/32/13414_2.png) [@seostar](https://forum.logik.tv/u/seostar)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 1:41am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/1 "2025-08-19T01:41:29Z")

</div>

Especially when we do things like screen liquid crystal synthesis  
Even if the liquid crystal is on the same plane, some of them are blurred, and some of them are pinned, so there’s no blur, right?  
So the screen needs to adjust the blur value accordingly, so what blur node does everyone use then? “y\_lensblur” is very light and good, but the problem is that this node lacks the “blooming” feature in the default “blur” node, so I think the highlight area lacks real blur…Please recommend any good blur nodes with “depth map” and “blooming” features!

I turned on the translator, so it might sound a little weird. Please understand

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Edusanjo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/edusanjo/32/1533_2.png) [@Edusanjo](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Edusanjo)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 4:29am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/2 "2025-08-19T04:29:13Z")

</div>

> **[Frischluft Lenscare OFX -](https://www.toolfarm.com/buy/frischluft_lenscare_ofx/)**
>
> Frischluft Lenscare OFX moves depth of field and out of focus generation to post-production, giving your footage breathtakingly realistic DoF

It is a bit slow and requires a good graphics card, but the results are incredible

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GPM](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/gpm/32/4224_2.png) [@GPM](https://forum.logik.tv/u/GPM)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/3 "2025-08-19T04:35:23Z")

</div>

It shows it’s compatible with Combustion and Fusion. Has anyone tried the OFX in Flame?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ton](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/ton/32/5542_2.png) [@Ton](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Ton)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 7:26am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/4 "2025-08-19T07:26:24Z")

</div>

Yeah.. been using it a lot… although, not with the most recent versions of Flame. I should check. It is very, very, very slow… and I think it has not had any development for ages..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Edusanjo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/edusanjo/32/1533_2.png) [@Edusanjo](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Edusanjo)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 7:37am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/5 "2025-08-19T07:37:33Z")

</div>

It works with flame….at least in 2025.2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrittCiampa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ec9cab/32.png) [@BrittCiampa](https://forum.logik.tv/u/BrittCiampa)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 2:06pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/6 "2025-08-19T14:06:01Z")

</div>

> [@seostar](#):
>
> … the blur value accordingly, so what blur node does everyone use then? “y\_lensblur” is very light and good, but the problem is that this node lacks the “blooming” feature in the default “blur” node, so I think the highlight area lacks real blur…Please recommend any good blur nodes with “depth map” and “blooming” features!I turned on the translator, so it might sound a little weird. Please understand

I might be the broken record here, but when using y\_lensblur are you blurring in linear? And do you have that selected as your colorspace for the node? Because I’m always in linear for my blurs, I never touch the blooming setting in the default blur node. Blooming also breaks any premultiplication.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maurypb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ce73a5/32.png) [@Maurypb](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Maurypb)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2026, 4:25am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/7 "2026-02-20T04:25:06Z")

</div>

> [@seostar](#):
>
> Please recommend any good blur nodes with “depth map” and “blooming” features!I turned on the translator, so it might sound a little weird. Please understand

Seostar, is this the sort of bloom you’re talking about? I’m looking for flame (and resolve) beta testers, drop me a note if you still need this kind of thing.

-maury

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cristhiancordoba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9e8a1a/32.png) [@cristhiancordoba](https://forum.logik.tv/u/cristhiancordoba)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2026, 4:57am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/8 "2026-02-20T04:57:13Z")

</div>

Wow man. This looks fantastic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maurypb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ce73a5/32.png) [@Maurypb](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Maurypb)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2026, 5:18am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/9 "2026-02-20T05:18:14Z")

</div>

Thanks! (I’m looking for beta testers - drop me a note if you’re interested - flame, resolve, nuke, lin mac win).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GPM](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/gpm/32/4224_2.png) [@GPM](https://forum.logik.tv/u/GPM)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2026, 5:58am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/10 "2026-02-20T05:58:20Z")

</div>

I am absolutely on to beta test this gem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Edusanjo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/edusanjo/32/1533_2.png) [@Edusanjo](https://forum.logik.tv/u/Edusanjo)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2026, 11:37am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/11 "2026-03-04T11:37:36Z")

</div>

I am also interested to become a beta tester. Linux 9.3 26.2.2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![julioleon](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/julioleon/32/14482_2.png) [@julioleon](https://forum.logik.tv/u/julioleon)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2026, 12:39am UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/12 "2026-03-05T00:39:54Z")

</div>

Can I join the Beta?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![melissavasiliev](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.logik.tv/melissavasiliev/32/11819_2.png) [@melissavasiliev](https://forum.logik.tv/u/melissavasiliev)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2026, 6:48pm UTC](https://forum.logik.tv/t/please-recommend-a-blur-node-based-on-depth/13401/13 "2026-03-05T18:48:01Z")

</div>

> [@Maurypb](#):
>
> Thanks! (I’m looking for beta testers - drop me a note if you’re interested - flame, resolve, nuke, lin mac win).

Looks really great! Interested in beta testing as well.
