That moment in 2026 when

…You go to make a library and have enough time to brew a pot of coffee.

Sigh.

Imagine if you were the 47th potus and you go to make a library but you can’t fit your Qatari jet through the front door…

Sighs matter…

and this is why we are still on 2025 in 2026. I have a feeling I’ll be saying that in 2027 too.

Sigh.

It’s the inconsistent “outta no where” and “near instantaneous” decline from working just fine to “I’m going to take a quick nap while this works it’s shit out” that catches me off-gaurd every time.

The parallels that can be drawn to the 47th potus continue…

Outta nowhere

Instantaneous decline

This would drive me nuts. I’m also on 2025.2.2 and it’s perfectly fine for the work I need to do.

Workspace auto-save triggered when iterating a batch group. 4 minutes for this small ass workspace… The batches are large but not batshit.

is project located on local storage or network?

Local.

I’ve been tell them the Library operations are multiple times slower in 2026+ than in 2025. In another forum there is a claim that a newer version is 30% faster in Library ops.

Meanwhile

Shit gun is appallingly slow.

There are many reasons.

All of which sound like “dog ate my homework…”

Life is short.

This stuff is ultimately meaningless…

(And if it were not reality would be different)

Move on.

Make money.

Blaze the trails.

Climb a mountain like @ALan

Having suffered through this and tried some things, I’m convinced the most performant way to run Flame now is to keep batch groups out of the libraries completely. Off the desktop too of course, other than the hot ones. The library structure, it turns out, can be replaced by whatever you decide to build as a harness externally- think of it like working super-unmanaged.

In my case, it happens that I had built some hooks and GUIs to make loading and iterating batches nicer and more standardized- since I’ve adopted an odd workflow with 4 sequential batch groups per-shot (i.e. ‘prep > comp > color > master’, I wanted code that managed these batches properly across multiple workstations. It just so happens for me that this workflow is much more performant! A happy accident.

With hooks, Flame workstations can just save out their iterations to local NVME, and then these saves can be rsynced to the studio NAS in the background. Whatever state machine you have working, then picks up on it and can list it as the most recent version to an artist opening the batch loader GUI on another station. Minimized nfs overhead, no project server overhead, and you can customize it precisely to your needs. Logik Projekt I think is the core, and any custom code that can run in the background will run circles around whatever happens in libraries.

This mirrors what I was considering today. Basically a loader for batches which exists outside the fold of the flame workspace.

I actually hate the desktop. I always have. That batch groups exist there break this critical boundary in my mind between effects and editorial organization… and this relentless bloat and slowness it all takes on just foments my position.

Sigh. Tomorrow I’ll crack open Claudex.

The fact that we would have to resort to this, for very basic file Load/Save operations is quite indicative that something terrible is going on. If you have ever Load/Save in Nuke, it is basically instantaneous.