Hello
Do the following two types of footage (photos with a still duration defined during import in Mediahub
consume the same amount of strorage space?
a photo with a still duration of 80 frames, 10 incoming handles/tails, 10 outdoing handles/tails
vs.
2
the same photo with a still duration of 100 frames (no handles/tails) ?
Thank’s for your feedback
PS
By the way, would appreciate the possibility to define the number of tails/handles during import in MediaHub very much!
It depends. If you loaded the still photo as a 100 frame clip, it takes up 100 frames, no matter how much is used and how much is handles. If you loaded the still photo as a virtual frame, it takes up the space of a single frame, no matter how much is used and how much is handles. Virtual frames, however, do not display handles. Only an *, since handles are irrelevant.
Interesting… going to find out how to import a still photo as virtual frame asap 
Can imagine that beside the advantage of saving storage space, there must be also disadvantages… Or are there any?
I’m certain that over the years I have come across some strange, unique instance in which a non-virtual frame would be better, but off hand I can’t think of any.
->If you loaded the still photo as a virtual frame
Expected to find an option in MediaHub, but that was not the case. Am I blind or is the option to perform such a special import located elsewhere?
If your photo is actually just one frame, such as a single jpeg, it should automatically load as a virtual frame. When you look at the segment on flame, the should be an * at each end of the segment, rather than a number indicating handles.
